This year, I'm taking part in the Fifty Book Challenge. Interested in joining me? Do you think you can read fifty books in a year? Find out more.
Reading and writing have been a passion of mine for almost the whole of my life. My mother taught me to read when I was two years old, whereupon I became voracious in my appetite for books, persuading the local library to give me my own card and constantly harrassing relatives to buy novels and short story collections for me. I believe that the ability to read is one of the greatest gifts that can be given to anybody, because it is a gift of power and independence, a valuable tool in taking control of one's own life. When one can read, so much information becomes available that it would take more than a human lifetime to process it all. It is a great frustration to me that I shall never be able to read everything, yet this is matched by my delight in the knowledge that there will always be something else wonderful out there (if only I can find it amid all the shite). Even when certain types of literature are suppressed by the state (most people in the UK remain unaware of their government's long history of banning books, an approach it now seeks to extend to the internet) there is always information available underground, passed over discreetly at the back of market stalls, pamphleted at demonstrations, and the like. Reading is not only about books - it is about the net, newspapers, leaflets, brochures, legal documentation, subtitles (often markedly different from dialogue they translate), street signs, billboards, notes passed in class, graffiti, ancient manuscripts, t-shirts and cornflake packets. The sad thing is that this world of information is denied not only to the illiterate, but also to those with poor literacy skills, a group increasing in number in the English-speaking nations, the casualties of a failing education system and of governments prepared to put up with reduced economic performance in exchange for having citizens who don't think too much. True literacy is not only about being able to make sense of letters and recognise written words, it's about being able to comprehend the subtle meanings of complex sentences. When we look, we must also strive to see. I believe that literate people owe it to the rest of the world to try and spread their skills, teaching others, giving them the skills necessary to analyse language for themselves. Not only writers have this duty - it belongs to every parent, employer, and friend. It is second only to our duty to educate ourselves.
I live in the city with the second most bookshops in the world (after Toronto), a country which, during the early rennaissance of the fifteenth and sixteenth centuries, led the world in the production of literature. Sadly, the average Scot now reads only six books a year. Some people further lament the decline in sales of newspapers, but I cannot say I have as much sympathy there - I myself gave up reading the newspapers available in the UK after they stopped hiring copyeditors, at which point they simply became too frustrating. Spellchecking programs do not do the same job. I really think this is a situation where the government should intervene and require publications with high distribution to meet certain basic levels so far as spelling and grammar are concerned, because it is from these publications that most people acquire their adult reading and writing skills. Anyway, I do still read Le Monde, Die Welt, The Moscow Times, The Hindustan Times and, in translation, Kyodo News, as well as occasional bits of the US press. These seem to give me a decent overview of most world news, and have higher literary standards than their UK counterparts.
Print publications have, of course, declined in part because of the success of the internet with its minimal turn-around time. It took me a few years of using the web to realise that I had utterly lost interest in most magazines, as information was always available more quickly online, usually at least as well written, and I no longer needed a paper source of pictures for my collages; there really wasn't anything else to hold me. The likes of Empire and Bizarre had by then lost most of their interesting content anyway, filling space with an increasing quantity of bland soft porn. There are exceptions. I retain my subscription to New Scientist, as it not only represents an excellent weekly summary of cutting edge science but is much better written than most arts-centered publications. My partner Donald, a former student of physics and astronomy, believes this is because a high proportion of scientists are dyslexic, and educated dyslexic people tend to be very careful to check through their work.
Despite this aversion, I still rely on print publications to publish a lot of my work, so I shouldn't be too mean. There are good ones out there, they're just hard to track down. I also edit one, TBD, which publishes original science fiction and fantasy short stories as well as news, reviews and articles related to the genre. It's part of my effort to get involved with new writers and encourage them to develop their work. I published my first piece of non-fiction at the age of fifteen and my first short story a year later. My first published novel, The Orpheus Industry, is available here. It's not the first one I've written - I would recommend that new authors get some practice in first before deciding their work is ready to face the world. Of course, that takes a lot of effort, but writing, when one is serious about it, is a job; one shouldn't enter into it expecting an easy ride.
"Literature is a business to me... My sole desire in writing is to make a reasonable living." wrote Robert E Howard, author of the famous Conan stories. "I may cling to many illusions, but I am not ridden by the illusion that I have anything wonderful or magical to say, or that it would amount to anything particularly if I did say it. I have no quarrel with art-for-art's-sakers. On the contrary, I admire their work. But my pet delusions tend in other directions."
I have a lot of sympathy with Howard's position. He was struggling to provide for his family, as I am; and I don't have a lot of other options so far as work is concerned, considering my illness and my partner's intermittent need for care. It's all very well for people to get high and mighty about how one shouldn't write unless one can produce art; many of us can't afford to take that attitude. Besides, I believe that literature should strive to serve a greater purpose than the intellectual satisfaction of an elite. It is vital that any society produce accessible, engaging literature, so that everybody can find some satisfaction in reading. Many children become disillusioned about reading because the books presented to them at school seem stilted and remote, out of touch with the world they know. Though I'm all for broadening horizons, I consider it to be of far greater immediate importance to give these children a genuine interest in exploring literature for themselves. They should be shown that reading can be exciting and fun.
Almost every writer has bills to pay and a household to maintain; there isn't always a day job to not give up; and I don't see anything wrong with producing lighter work as the main way of making a living. If one desires to produce great art, it can be done alongside this. I would argue that, in any event, the greatest art is that which can provide some measure of satisfaction to everyone encountering it; and I don't think writers learn the skills necessary to produce that if they shy away from the mass market. Though many people end up in this profession because they prefer a reclusive lifestyle, it is a writer's job to engage with humanity; to acknowledge its imperfections, but not to judge the bulk of it incapable of sensitivity or undeserving of entertainment.
The other side of this, of course, is that writing can be seen as a terribly pretentious occupation. I dread those moments at parties when strangers ask "And what do you do?", because I know that, more often than not, they're going to be followed by sneers, by an assumption that I'm lying or that I'm showing off. I tend to mention my job to new people as a hasty aside, promptly changing the subject; yet I long to bitch about certain of my editors as surely as any call centre worker likes to bitch about hir supervisor, and I worry that I bore the few patient friends who end up bearing the brunt of that. It's worse, of course, if I admit that I do have some artistic ambitions; I am constantly striving to develop and improve my work, and to expand my range. Regarding this, I have looked into creative writing courses and that sort of thing, but have come to the conclusion that few of them have anything useful to teach once one has got beyond the basics. The single best way to learn how to write (whether for publication or simply for one's own pleasure) is to read. Read widely; take recommendations from friends; and make an effort, every now and again, to approach a book you expect to hate. I'll admit that, for me, this is as much a compulsion as a deliberate strategy. Sitting in waiting rooms with nothing to do, I'll read and re-read the ingredients lists on the sides of chocolate bar wrappers; by the age of twelve, I knew how to write 'monosodium glutamate' in eight languages.
Listed below are a few books and short stories I'd personally recommend; I make no claims to them all being great literature, but they all made an impression on me, so, if you think you might enjoy the same sort of thing, check them out.
You can see some more of my book reviews archived in Io's science fiction and fantasy book listing here.
This way to go back to Jennie's personal pages.
Last updated 28th December, 2005