Jennie On Film




On the left are links to some of my film reviews, catalogued according to the years in which I first saw those films at the cinema. I'm content director for Eye For Film, the UK's biggest dedicated film website, so you can also find some of my work there, including exclusive reviews, interviews and features.

Film has always been one of my great loves. When I first watched King Kong, aged two, I was smitten by Fay Wray, and I drew a picture of her in a yellow dress being clutched by a great black ape atop the Empire State Building. From that point onwards I was always drawing up storyboards and pretending to make films using cardboard cameras and my toys as actors (at six I made The Life of Christ, which freaked out certain relatives, especially as I had a female doll named Lola playing the lead, nailed to a wooden crucifix in my brother's room... I was just innocently aiming for realism). I dreamed of the day when I might be able to make my own films, though I never thought it would happen.

At college at the age of sixteen, I took an extra-curricular vocational course in video editing. In my late teens and early twenties, my career necessitated a number of TV appearances, each of which provided a chance to learn more about the business. University brought the opportunity to work with GUST, the student television body, making programmes for cable, script doctoring, and directing other people's short films. I also designed and directed music videos, though my options were limited by a very small budget.

At the earliest opportunity I got myself work as a film reviewer. Everyone always thinks this is the perfect job because one gets to see so many films for free, but they're not accounting for some of the awful stuff I've had to sit through, with no option to walk out. I have one rule, and that's that I don't do chick flicks (with very rare exceptions at the boundaries of the genre), but in return for accepting that my various editors have made sure they got their money's worth. Of course, when I was a student, any money was welcome, as were the free lunches which often accompanied previews in those days. Latterly, there's been an agreement between the studios to cut back on such bribes.

I got back into film-making in the early twenty first century, after a long break necessitated by my partner Donald's illness. In 2005 I wrote, produced and co-directed Dead End Job, a Scottish zombie romp. I currently have a film based on one of my short stories, All That Glitters, in production in Los Angeles, being directed by Johnny Wu; and I'm getting together a good local team with which I hope to embark on local projects in the near future.

To me, the first essential ingredient of a good film is a good script, though I admit that's probably a bias brought about by my own occupation. I don't really see the point of making a movie where everything works except the words. Even a silent film needs to be carefully storyboarded right from the start. I feel that a good film should have something to say, or should at least provide a lot of fun whilst saying little, and that requires three things on the part of its producers: single-mindedness, self-discipline, and faith. Single-mindedness because endless compromise dilutes the richest of stories down to nothingness. Self-discipline because it will always be necessary to sacrifice some parts of the vision for the sake of the whole, and overindulgence always shows. Faith because there comes a moment, after everything else, when the project must be let go. Continued fiddling can whittle away any masterpiece, and overpolishing can leave it with a characterless gloss. Sometimes what is raw is much more potent in its impact.

Favourite Films

In no particular order, as these things change with my mood:-


  • Blue Velvet - a well crafted, concise story which nevertheless deals intelligently with some complex emotional issues. I like this film because it makes its characters three dimensional even while they function as archetypes. As JG Ballard described it, it is a fairy tale, and elegantly directed in that style, as if with a child's eye.
  • Matador! - full of colour, intensity and passion; a film I can really connect to, which fits with the way I think and feel. Almodóvar is a brave director who never shrinks from examining topics which might squick the general public, yet manages not to get too caught up in a surface show of wierdness, and is never satisfied with that alone. This film has enormous energy and is gripping throughout.
  • Kind Hearts and Coronets - a film in which not a word is wasted; elegantly witty, deliciously dark and superbly played. It's hard to think of any way this could be improved on. Plus, of course, there's all the fun of seeing Alec Guinness play nine different people.
  • Caligula - When I saw this for the first time I was quite blown away. I know that most of the world hates it, that it's an editorial mess with no fully satisfying version available, and that it has been described as "at best, a flawed masterpiece", but I think it's absolutely beautiful. Malcolm McDowell is one of my favourite actors and brings real conviction to the central role, so that his character is always believable and, in his own way, consistent, a true innocent in a decaying and decadent world. Donald says it's one of the most romantic [1] films he's ever seen, which might explain something of why I like it so much. I just know that I cannot imagine ever tiring of watching it. It is so intense, and so real.
  • Trainspotting - probably the most blatantly fashionable of my choices here, this film meant a lot to me because it's about a lifestyle I can relate to; it's about people who live in the same world as me and have the same concerns, and with wit and gusto it shouts out the obvious things which have long needed saying but which we never previously seemed to have a voice for.
  • Picnic at Hanging Rock - Weir's later work never equalled this; it is a long film, often accused of being slow, but I never tire of viewing it, and it always keeps me spellbound. There's something really dark there at the edge of the subconscious, and an incredible beauty in the unspoken love and strange distance of the girls, which gives it its mysterious power.
  • Casablanca - again, I love this film because of its tight and witty script and all the different levels on which things are happening. Every time I watch it I find something new. I also find the understated romance developing between Rick and Louis particularly touching and astute for its time.
  • Twin Peaks: Fire Walk With Me - another film which seems to be set in my own world, having a lot of similarities to events in my own life, this has been of immense value to me; it's the first thing of somebody else's I have seen which seems to understand exactly how I feel and how I fear, without being patronising or wanting to play the hero. It's brutally honest and I respect that. And so I don't find it at all surprising that other people hate it.
  • Se7en - this was a real surprise for me, a richly crafted, intelligent film emerging from Hollywood with a beautiful dark sense of humour which seemed to completely bypass most of its audience but still didn't inhibit its success. A divine comedy.
  • Carnival of Souls - a strangely haunting little film; once seen, never forgotten. Other films appeal to my heart, brain, or (as Shakespeare might have put it) to my liver; this touches my soul.
  • Performance - this one manages to do wonderfully original things with a non-linear plot and creative use of imagery. It's a film that draws the viewer in, no matter what. Its message about the power of decadence and the contrasting viciousness of the gangland world is cleverly delivered by enabling the viewer to become a part of the process, contributing to its identity-challenging aesthetic.
  • Dogs in Space - one of the most beautiful and evocative movies ever made about the goth/punk lifestyle, this was actually based on the life of my ex flatmate's friend, and apparently he hated it; but whether or not it's an accurate biopic, I think it stands on its own merits and has valuable things to say. It's all the more poignant now as it contains a remarkable performance from Michael Hutchence.
  • Repulsion - Polanski is one of the few directors working in mainstream movies today whom I might actually credit with genius, and this, from my perspective, is his finest work. Again, the course of its heroine's madness is something I can relate to, and for this reason I find it deeply disturbing, but it is also cathartic. I respect Polanski for carrying through to their logical conclusion themes which most would shrink from, and for doing so without being judgemental.
  • Vertigo - my favourite Hitchcock. For once the great director was not encumbered by wooden actors, and had a powerful story to work from. Further, I think it contains some of his most striking and innovative photographic work.
  • Drowning by Numbers - I've always been attracted to water and drowning, and I guess that's one reason why I like this film; but I also love the theme of games which runs through it, and the childlike imagination with which these are realised, and the intricacy with which all the different threads are woven together.

    I was also very much impressed by The Thirteenth Warrior and Pi, full reviews of which you can see here.


    Some Popular Films I Think are a bit Shite

    Like it says...


  • Scream - 'irony' is not an excuse for tedium.
  • Jurassic Park - flawed animation (why didn't the ground move when the dinosaurs did? Why were the shadows so badly done?), far too many badly drawn characters and a derivative plot so full of holes that it would seem even the velociraptors found it tasteless. Cute monsters, shame about the film.
  • Carrie - why do so many people admire the ending of this movie? It's not shocking. It's obvious from pretty much the opening scene. It's contrived, pathetic, and not remotely scary. I do like some moments in this movie, notably the ones which examine Carrie's psychological suffering at the hands of her schoolmates, but the supernatural aspect is overblown and achieves nothing.
  • Macbeth - in general I do adore Polanski's work; this is the exception. Francesca Annes makes a particularly wet and irritating Lady MacBeth. The nudity is, frankly, silly, as any resident of Scotland can tell you. This is overplayed and overhyped.
  • Titanic - ultimately a bit of a damp squib. This kind of movie makes fine entertainment for a wet Sunday afternoon on BBC2, but all those Oscars? Come on! DiCaprio's acting is fairly good, and the iceberg scenes are impressive, but other than that it's just a glossy big-budget b-movie with a particularly nauseous theme song.
  • Basic Instinct - an erotic thriller with Michael Douglas? Isn't that a contradiction in terms? Though not as ugly, Sharon Stone is also rather dull. What exactly is there about her that's supposed to be so revolutionary and exciting? Most of her sex life seems tame even by the standards of teenage magazines, and she has all the animal magnetism of a lettuce.
  • Pretty Woman - should the height of a woman's aspirations be that a rich man make her financially secure so she only needs to fuck him instead of lots of people? A story about characters who think that way might be interesting, but this bit of fluff is incapable of self-examination and does nothing but peddle unhealthy illusions.

  • [1] The word romantic here being used in its proper sense, as I always use it, without any ugly modern distortions relating to sentimentality and flowers.


    This way to go back to Jennie's personal pages.

    Last updated 8th June, 2008.